2003 C++ Free Freeware Yes Yes No No No No No No ? Īlphatk Vince Darley 1999 $40 Proprietary, with BSD components No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No ? Yes No No Yes Yes ? Yes Yes Yes Yes YesĪptEdit Brother Technology 2003 C++ $44.95 Proprietary No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No 1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes ? Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesĪquamacs David Reitter 2005 01. Name Creator First public release Latest stable version Programming language used Cost (US$) Software license Open source Windows Mac OS X Linux BSD Unix OpenVMS Java English German French Polish Japanese Italian Dutch Portuguese Spanish Swedish Total Multiple instances Single document window splitting MDI: Overlappable windows MDI: Tabbed document interface MDI: Window splitting Spell checking Regex-based find & replace Encoding conversion Newline conversion Multiple undo/redo Rectangular block selection Syntax highlighting Function list Symbol database Bracket matching Auto indentation Auto completion Code folding Text folding Compiler integration Text shell integration Graphical shell integration Macro Collaborative editing Large file support Multi-line regex support Dynamically customizable Mac OS X Vi Emacs Pico FTP HTTP SSH WebDAV ASCII ISO-8859 DOS (OEM) EBCDIC UTF-8 UTF-16 RTL Bidi Windows (CR/LF) Unix (LF) Mac (CR)Īcme Rob Pike 1993 Plan 9 and Inferno Free LPL, (OSI approved) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes ? Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No ? Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No ? No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes ? Yes No No Yes NoĪcroEdit SungDong Kim 1999 0.9.18.82 Delphi Free Freeware No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No No 5 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes YesĪkelPad Shengalts A.A. I merged the information in one CSV-file (separated with semikolon) like this - you can take this into MS-Excel and filter there out your preferred editor : (unless, of course, the first column and the first row would be always visible) - CrazyTerabyte 01:42, (UTC) If all tables were merged in only one, it would be really confusing to look at them. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.193.63.155 ( talk This article is a wonderful resource, but surely some of these tables could be combined somehow, so readers didn't have to scroll up and down constantly to make comparisons. Hopefully I didn't introduce any problems. I've finished (and fixed) what IE started. The question is whether to carry through some or all of IE's changes to the rest of the tables, or go back to the way they were. You're correct that it would have to be handled carefully. I mean the edits starting at 12:03, 2 October 2006 and ending with 06:12, 5 October 2006 (a couple of edits by others are mixed in), plus another at 13:30, 13 October 2006. (IE ended up reverting at least one correction - maybe several - so it might take a bit of work.) - Smjg 15:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC) Sorry. And if we're going to revert anything, we should be careful not to revert any corrections/updates to the information itself. Heptite (T) (C) 23:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC) It would help to know which of IE's modifications you're talking about, and which version it is that you're claiming looked better. I hate to say it, but I'm tempted to revert IE's modifications of the tables, mostly because the modifications haven't been carried through to be consistent on all the tables, but also because I think they looked better before the modifications.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |